Though gay groups claim a moral victory for close contests. The Washington Post story said the Arizona result wasn’t pro-gay. From the story: “They were voting against a measure in the amendment that would have denied benefits to domestic partners," said Arizona State University analyst Bruce Merrill. (
Washington Post) but the proposition in Arizona called for marriage to be defined as “between one man and one woman.” (
Protect Marriage AZ) The Arizona vote was close. (
Arizona Central) Another story notes “Marriage already is defined by state statute, making this amendment unnecessary.” (
Arizona Daily Star)
No comments:
Post a Comment