REPORTER: DEMOCRAT GAVE FOLEY EMAILS IN MAY

Ironically, the writer uses this information to claim it wasn’t an October surprise. Yet here it is, a story that was out there and unpromoted until October. (Harpers) Another story declared “The timing of the e-mails' release appears to be more of a coincidence than an "October surprise," designed to affect the outcome of the elections. It took more than a year for the e-mails to be published because one publication after another decided not to print them.” Still, they held the story until October, then promoted the story relentlessly. That’s not suspicious? (Washington Post)