In certain precincts of a world encouraged to embrace differences, Christ is out. The terms "B.C." and "A.D." increasingly are shunned by certain scholars. Educators and historians say schools from North America to Australia have been changing the terms "Before Christ," or B.C., to "Before Common Era," or B.C.E., and "anno Domini" (Latin for "in the year of the Lord") to "Common Era." In short, they're referred to as B.C.E. and C.E.
The life of Christ still divides the epochs, but the change has stoked the ire of Christians and religious leaders who see it as an attack on a social and political order that has been in place for centuries. For more than a century, Hebrew lessons have used B.C.E. and C.E., with C.E. sometimes referring to Christian Era. This raises the question: Can old and new coexist in harmony, or must one give way to the other to reflect changing times and attitudes?
The terms B.C. and A.D. have clear Catholic roots. Dionysius Exiguus, an abbot in Rome, devised them as a way to determine the date for Easter for Pope St. John I. The terms were continued under the Gregorian Calendar, created in 1582 under Pope Gregory XIII.
Although most calendars are based on an epoch or person, B.C. and A.D. have always presented a particular problem for historians: There is no year zero; there's a 33-year gap, reflecting the life of Christ, dividing the epochs. Critics say that's additional reason to replace the Christian-based terms.
More
1 comment:
I'm mixed on this. I'd prefer to use the AD and BC myself, but if a Jewish or Muslim scholar felt odd about it, and wanted BCE or CE, fine. Though as your post points out, Jesus is still the dividing point, and when people say that CE means "Common Era", what is that supposed to mean?
A a member of the Universal Church, I can posit one guess, but the P.C. masses won't like it!
Post a Comment