'As provocative as possible,' seems an apt moniker for Britney Spears and for the recently unveiled statue of the pop star giving birth in the nude. The sculpture by Daniel Edwards depicts Spears in the highly unlikely birthing - but highly sexually provocative - position of crouching on all fours.
The rub is that Edwards called his work 'Monument to Pro-Life: The Birth of Sean Preston'.
Edwards sounds sincere in his proclamation that the sculpture is pro-life. "Britney provides inspiration for those struggling with the 'right choice'," he said in a press release touting the statue. "She was number one with Google last year, with good reason --- people are inspired by the beauty of a pregnant woman," said Edwards.
Sure, people are inspired by the beauty of a pregnant woman, but they are not thinking of the beauty of woman or of pregnancy when they view porn, even if it is 'pregnancy porn' popularized in 1991 by Demi Moore.
Pornography, which is the best description of Edwards' sculpture, is never art.
LifeSiteNews.com
1 comment:
What the hell are you talking about?
Statements containing the word never are never correct.
Art is where you find it... And I happen to think this was beautifully executed, thought provoking, sexy, and pro-life.
Peter
Post a Comment