DOCTOR WHO EXAMINED SCHIAVO SAYS SHE IS NOT IN PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE Remarkably, some are discounting his evaluation just because he’s pro-life. So now only pro-abortion doctors should be considered? (LA Times)
MAINSTREAM NEWSPAPERS DECIDE DEATH BY STARVATION NOT SO BAD AFTER ALL
All of a sudden, major news outlets want us to believe her death is painless, even “peaceful.” Meanwhile, people feel sorry for a giant lobster and set it free. (Washington Post)
LIBERAL ORGANIZATIONS HELPING THE DISADVANTAGED TURN THEIR BACK ON SCHIAVO From the National Organization for Women to the National Coalition for Domestic Violence. (Washington Times) Not a word from Amnesty International. (Amnesty) And the one group constantly battling in favor of life for murderers, the ACLU, is suddenly thrilled to watch a woman die a slow death. (ACLU) One writer points out she’s not brain dead, “Terri is inconvenient.” (FNIF)
4 comments:
So, to support the rule of law over religious dogma is "liberal"?
Funny how conservatives want to eliminate government interference... unless it involves our birth, death, or sex lives.
What a collection of pompous hypocrites.
LIFE, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness is not religious dogma. Compassion and value of life is not exclusive to one group. We should all be ashamed anything like this could be allowed to happen to this poor woman or any person.
I'm ashamed that the government is sticking its nose where it doesn't belong, and strangers with agendas are interfering with what should be strictly a private matter.
I'm ashamed a entire country stands back to watch this women starve to death!
Post a Comment